Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: MB migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MPSW food: biPz, biHl class:
MRE = 0.058 habitat: 0iMpe gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.008 embryo: Mpe reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 1825 1819 (0.003052) d life span StewHugh2007
Lp 24 24 (0.0001538) cm fork length at puberty StewHugh2007
Li 39 40.79 (0.0458) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.0042 0.004236 (0.008621) g wet weight at birth Wiki
Wwi 25.9 25.5 (0.01529) g ultimate wet weight fisfbase
Ri 3.562 2.43 (0.3178) #/d maximum reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.08395) StewHugh2007
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.07655) StewHugh2007

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Hyporhamphus australis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02537 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.95 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 136.3 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • wet weight (g) = 0.00240*(TL in cm)^3.10 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation