Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: Cfa, MB migrate: Ma phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THp, MPNW food: biPz, biHl class:
MRE = 0.015 habitat: 0jFr, 0iMm gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.001 embryo: Fp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 3285 3284 (0.0001681) d life span StewHugh2007
Lp 10 10.08 (0.007592) cm fork length at puberty fishbase
Li 20.3 20.27 (0.001422) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.0042 0.004203 (0.0007208) g wet weight at birth Wiki
Wwp 1.7 1.696 (0.002506) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 13.8 13.81 (0.0005991) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 0.411 0.4017 (0.02247) #/d maximum reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth fork length (0.03039) YeMore2014

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Hyporhamphus intermedius Unit Description
v 0.02 0.0207 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 19.58 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.534 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.95 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8003 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • wet weight (g) = 0.00186*(TL in cm)^2.96 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation