Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: BWh, BSh migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: TA, TO food: biPz, biHl class:
MRE = 0.050 habitat: 0jFr, 0iMm gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.007 embryo: Fp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 3285 3285 (6.908e-06) d life span StewHugh2007
Lp 20 20 (2.038e-05) cm fork length at puberty StewHugh2007
Li 35.5 37 (0.04232) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.0042 0.004206 (0.001371) g wet weight at birth Wiki
Wwi 174 172.1 (0.01117) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 10.96 11.5 (0.04938) #/d maximum reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.07601) StewHugh2007
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.06417) StewHugh2007

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Hyporhamphus regularis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02752 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.95 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 116.4 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8008 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • wet weight (g) = 0.00240*(TL in cm)^3.10 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation