Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: MC migrate: Ma phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MAm food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.043 habitat: 0iMcd gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.009 embryo: Ms reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 8.5 8.998 (0.0586) d age at birth guess
am 584 584 (2.074e-05) d life span fishbase
Lp 1.45 1.552 (0.07035) cm total length at puberty KevrKokki1990
Li 4.11 4.309 (0.04851) cm ultimate total length for females KevrKokki1990
Lim 2.91 2.868 (0.01433) cm ultimate total length for males KevrKokki1990
Wwb 0.000205 0.0002059 (0.004273) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 0.03 0.02939 (0.02028) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 0.624 0.6292 (0.008344) g ultimate wet weight for females KevrKokki1990
Wwim 0.169 0.1698 (0.004529) g ultimate wet weight for males KevrKokki1990

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LN total length fecundity (0.2948) KevrKokki1990
tL time since birth total length (0.02793) KevrKokki1990

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Knipowitschia panizzae Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02541 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 48.18 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.2166 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9395 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8019 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Facts

  • Weight-length: Ww in g = 0.00977*(TL in cm)^3.05 (Ref: fishbase)
  • Eggs on unserside valve of Cerastoderma glaucum (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation