Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA, Af migrate: Ma phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MP, TOh food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.027 habitat: 0iFl, 0iFr, 0iMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.001 embryo: Fnm, Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 2920 2912 (0.002897) d time since birth at death fishesoftexas
Lp 18 18.28 (0.01553) cm total length at puberty fishesoftexas
Li 23 23.62 (0.02703) cm ultimate total length fishesoftexas
Wwb 0.0045 0.004416 (0.01862) g wet weight at birth fishesoftexas
Wwp 146.6 145.6 (0.006519) g wet weight at piberty fishbase, fishesoftexas
Wwi 312 314.3 (0.007329) g ultimate wet weight fishbase, fishesoftexas
Ri 90.41 87.39 (0.03338) #/d maximum reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LW total length weight (0.06879) Naka1968
tL time since birth fork length (0.03747) Naka1968

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Kuhlia sandvicensis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02389 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 89.95 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.1159 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.8 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8025 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed not to differ from females

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.01995*(TL in cm)^3.08 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation