Predictions & Data for this entry
| Model: std | climate: BSk, Cfb, Cs | migrate: | phylum: |
| COMPLETE = 2.5 | ecozone: THp | food: biCi | class: |
| MRE = 0.079 | habitat: 0iTh, 0iTf | gender: Dg | order: |
| SMSE = 0.012 | embryo: Tt | reprod: O | family: |
Zero-variate data
| Data | Observed | Predicted | (RE) | Unit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ab | 96 | 79.31 | (0.1739) | d | age at birth | Marco1994 |
| tp | 810 | 672.9 | (0.1693) | d | time since birth at puberty for females | Marco2011 |
| tpm | 575 | 494.3 | (0.1403) | d | time since birth at puberty for males | Marco2011 |
| am | 3285 | 3285 | (2.705e-07) | d | life span | Marco1994 |
| Lb | 2.9 | 3.256 | (0.1228) | cm | SVL at birth | Marco2011 |
| Lp | 8.2 | 8.542 | (0.04169) | cm | SVL at puberty | Galan1989 |
| Lpm | 7.2 | 7.199 | (7.073e-05) | cm | SVL at puberty for males | Galan1989 |
| Li | 13.1 | 12.05 | (0.07981) | cm | ultimate SVL | Salvador1988 |
| Lim | 12 | 12.15 | (0.01235) | cm | ultimate SVL for males | Salvador1988 |
| Ww0 | 0.6 | 1.038 | (0.7303) | g | initial wet weight | Brito1998 |
| Wwb | 0.77 | 0.7287 | (0.05366) | g | wet weight at birth | Marco2011 |
| Wwi | 30.2 | 36.98 | (0.2243) | g | ultimate wet weight | Galan1984 |
| Wwim | 23.2 | 37.92 | (0.6347) | g | ultimate wet weight for males | Galan1984 |
| Ri | 0.06575 | 0.05741 | (0.1269) | #/d | ultimate reproduction rate | Marco1994 |
Uni- and bivariate data
| Data | Figure | Independent variable | Dependent variable | (RE) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tL_j |   | time since birth | SVL | (0.1503) | Salvador1988 |
| tL_f | | time since birth | SVL | (0.06937) | Salvador1988 |
| tL_m | | time since birth | SVL | (0.06854) | Salvador1988 |
| LN |  | length | yearly fecundity | (0.1787) | Marco1994 |
| LWw |  | length (SVL) | weight (g) | (0.1194) | Salvador1988 |
| Tab |  | temperature | incubation duration | (0.07398) | Monasterio2013 |
| tT |  | time | temperature | (0.05255) | Salvador1988 |
Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C
| Data | Generalised animal | Lacerta schreiberi | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v | 0.02 | 0.04478 | cm/d | energy conductance |
| p_M | 18 | 31.09 | J/d.cm^3 | vol-spec som maint |
| k_J | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1/d | maturity maint rate coefficient |
| k | 0.3 | 0.5037 | - | maintenance ratio |
| kap | 0.8 | 0.8052 | - | allocation fraction to soma |
| kap_G | 0.8 | 0.8015 | - | growth efficiency |
| kap_R | 0.95 | 0.95 | - | reproduction efficiency |
Discussion
- Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp
- I set zero weights to ab, Ww0, Wwi and Wwim. ab: it is inconsistent with univariate (Tab) data. Ww0: data comes from a different population in Portugal. Wwi and Wwim: data from a population in Galicia, and obviously inconsistent with the univariate data that comes from Leon.
- temperature in tL data is assumed to oscillate as T(t) = T_m + T_a*sin(2*pi*(t-t_T)/365)
- curator: weight for tp and tpm have been set to 0 because of complex temperature trajectory
Bibliography