Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MAW food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.064 habitat: 0jMp, jiMr gender: Hsm order:
SMSE = 0.011 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 8395 8228 (0.01991) d life span fishbase
Lp 18.1 18 (0.005519) cm total length at puberty fishbase
Li 91 89.9 (0.01213) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.00039 0.0004153 (0.06485) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 112.3 105.2 (0.06346) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 1.316e+04 1.31e+04 (0.004403) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 2274 2378 (0.04573) #/d reprod rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth total length (0.1574) McBrRich2007

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Lachnolaimus maximus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01941 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 7.934 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0005374 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3564 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9506 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7953 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are supposed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Facts

  • length weight: Ww in g = 0.02188*(TL in cm)^2.95 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation