Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB, MC migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.3 ecozone: MA, MAm food: biPz class:
MRE = 0.025 habitat: 0jMpe, jiMp gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.002 embryo: Mpe reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 3285 3285 (5.116e-05) d life span SionCarl2011
Lp 17 16.78 (0.01292) cm standard length fat puberty guess
Li 30 30.51 (0.01708) cm ultimate standard length fishbase
Wwb 1.4e-05 1.4e-05 (0.0003446) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 33.1 33.24 (0.004354) g wet weight at puberty guess, fishbase
Wwi 201 199.9 (0.005633) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 986.3 990.2 (0.003958) #/d max reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth standard length (0.04737) SionCarl2011

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Lampanyctus crocodilus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02569 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 19.37 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.5397 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8003 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed not to differ from females
  • scaled functional response for tL data is high, but measured length exceeds L_m

Facts

  • Length-Weight relationship: W in g = 0.00417*(SL in cm)^3.17 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation