Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MC migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.3 ecozone: MPNE food: biPz class:
MRE = 0.039 habitat: 0jMpe, jiMp gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.003 embryo: Mpe reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 2190 2195 (0.002119) d life span ChilTayl1980
Lp 8 7.995 (0.0006206) cm standard length fat puberty ChilTayl1980
Li 12 13.73 (0.1438) cm ultimate standard length fishbase
Wwb 1.4e-05 1.405e-05 (0.003848) g wet weight at birth ChilTayl1980
Wwp 6.8 5.007 (0.2636) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 25.5 25.34 (0.006412) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 397.3 395.3 (0.004855) #/d max reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth standard length (0.0461) ChilTayl1980

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Lampanyctus ritteri Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02569 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 58.47 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.1785 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8019 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed not to differ from females
  • scaled functional response for tL data is high, but measured length exceeds L_m

Facts

  • Length-Weight relationship: W in g = 0.00794*(SL in cm)^3.25 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation