Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: ET migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.1 ecozone: TH food: biCv, biCi class:
MRE = 0.018 habitat: 0iMc gender: Dg order:
SMSE = 0.001 embryo: Tnsfm reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 27.5 25.01 (0.09067) d age at birth avibase
tx 43.7 43.65 (0.001155) d time since birth at fledging avibase
tp 131 131.2 (0.001709) d time since birth at puberty guess
tR 1460 1460 ( 0) d time since birth at 1st brood avibase
am 1.142e+04 1.144e+04 (0.00115) d life span avibase
Wwb 73.8 76.35 (0.03454) g weight at birth avibase
Wwi 1373 1360 (0.009657) g ultimate wet weight for females avibase
Wwim 1703 1704 (0.0005243) g ultimate wet weight for males avibase
Ri 0.009041 0.009054 (0.001405) #/d maximum reprod rate avibase
JOi 2664 2581 (0.03097) ml O2/h max BMR GavrGolu2023

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Larus hyperboreus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.03109 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 1.396e+04 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.001049 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9752 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7999 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
s_s 0.01 0.01752 - supply stress

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • Data JOi seems to be unrealistically high; needs to be checked

Bibliography

Citation