Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: TPa food: bjPz, jiCvf, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.035 habitat: 0iFl gender: Hsm order:
SMSE = 0.002 embryo: Fp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 2.2 6.542 (1.974) d age at birth guess
am 1.278e+04 1.282e+04 (0.00333) d life span guess
Lp 45.5 44.77 (0.01614) cm total length at puberty fishbase
Li 80 79.01 (0.01232) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.000344 0.0003258 (0.05304) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 906.7 902.8 (0.004281) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 4900 4965 (0.0132) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 1.068e+04 1.033e+04 (0.03366) #/d maximum reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth total length (0.04856) MunyMwap2002

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Lates mariae Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01716 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 5.781 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.000321 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.2907 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.6481 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7992 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
s_s 0.01 0.01325 - supply stress

Discussion

  • males are assumed to not differ from females

Facts

  • length-weight relationship: Ww in g = 0.01000*(TL in cm)^2.99 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation