Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MC migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MAE, MAm food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.030 habitat: 0jMp, jiMcd gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.002 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 7 7.353 (0.05042) d time since hatch at birth guess
am 5840 5784 (0.009615) d life span guess
Lp 20 20.19 (0.009436) cm total length at puberty Sant1995
Li 40 41.48 (0.03701) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.0005236 0.0005126 (0.02093) g wet weight at birth fishbase
Wwp 49.3 49.1 (0.004059) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 423 425.9 (0.006804) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 326 318 (0.02463) #/d maximum reprod rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.06808) LandPere2002
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.06957) LandPere2002

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Lepidorhombus boscii Unit Description
v 0.02 0.04637 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 67.76 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.1541 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.6453 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8013 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
s_s 0.01 0.005409 - supply stress

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • length-weight: W in g = 0.00457*(TL in cm)^3.1 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation