Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: Cfa, Dfa migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THn food: biCi, biCvf class:
MRE = 0.020 habitat: 0iFr, 0iFl, 0iFm gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.001 embryo: Fh reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
tp 1278 1241 (0.02838) d time since birth at puberty ADW
am 6205 6205 (1.843e-05) d life span fishbase
Lp 45 46.72 (0.03824) cm total length at puberty ADW, MuriPark2009
Li 132 128.4 (0.0276) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.0082 0.008205 (0.0006294) g wet weight at birth WallYeag1990
Wwi 1.268e+04 1.272e+04 (0.003285) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 16.44 16.45 (0.0004477) #/d max reprod rate ADW

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.0365) MuriPark2009
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.04712) MuriPark2009

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Lepisosteus platyrhincus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01779 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.9535 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 17.07 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.7999 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • Males ase assumed to differ froam females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
  • It was necessary to add 2 yr to age-estimate to arrive at a natural fit
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • From photo: SL = 0.89 * TL (Ref: Wiki)
  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.00229*(TL in cm)^3.18 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation