Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: Cfa, Cfb migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: TA food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.065 habitat: 0bTf, 0iTg gender: Dg order:
SMSE = 0.010 embryo: Fpf reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
tj 84 80.83 (0.03779) d time since birth at metam HengBurg2002
am 2190 2193 (0.001203) d life span guess
Lp 4.3 4.294 (0.001349) cm SVL at puberty for females guess
Li 7.5 7.478 (0.002978) cm ultimate SVL for females Wiki
Lim 7 7.056 (0.007944) cm ultimate SVL for males Wiki
Wwb 0.0018 0.001799 (0.0007631) g wet weight at birth HengBurg2002
Wwj 0.4 0.4365 (0.09113) g wet weight at metam HengBurg2002
Wwi 35.2 35.32 (0.003317) g ultimate wet weight for females guess
Wwim 28.6 28.58 (0.0007715) g ultimate wet weight for males guess
Ri 2.74 2.734 (0.002242) #/d maximum reprod rate HengBurg2002

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tW time wet weight (0.1156) HengBurg2002

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Limnodynastes peronii Unit Description
v 0.02 0.1877 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.9975 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 973.4 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8018 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • temperatures are guessed, but that for tW is given

Bibliography

Citation