Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: BWh, BWk, BSh, BSk migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: TA food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.122 habitat: 0iTd, 0iTa gender: Dg order:
SMSE = 0.031 embryo: Tt reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 120 115.5 (0.03733) d age at birth Kear2017
ap 446 511.5 (0.147) d age at puberty Kear2017
am 3650 3663 (0.003645) d life span Chap2003
Lb 4.2 3.7 (0.119) cm total length at birth Kear2017
Lp 6 5.583 (0.06955) cm total length at puberty Kear2017
Li 8.6 9.067 (0.05432) cm ultimate total length Kear2017
Wwb 1.85 1.884 (0.01849) g wet weight at birth Kear2017
Wwp 7.63 6.472 (0.1517) g wet weight at puberty Kear2017
Wwi 21.41 27.73 (0.2953) g ultimate wet weight Kear2017
Ri 0.01644 0.01472 (0.1046) #/d maximum reprod rate Pian1982

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LW snout vent length wet weight (0.1171) Kear2017
TO temperature O2 consumption rate (0.401) Kear2017
tL age length (0.06032) Kear2017
tW age weight (0.124) KearUnpub

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Liopholis inornata Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01966 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.4572 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 15.56 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0003167 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8135 - growth efficiency
k 0.3 0.1571 - maintenance ratio

Discussion

  • The T_A is estimated outside of this fitting procedure in a general study of Egernia-group lizards
  • In view of low somatic maintenance, pseudodata k_J = 0.002 1/d is replaced by pseudodata k = 0.3

Bibliography

Citation