Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB migrate: Ma phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MASE food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.065 habitat: 0iMp, jiMc gender: Hsm order:
SMSE = 0.007 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 6.5 9.654 (0.4853) d age at birth guess
am 8030 8045 (0.001826) d life span Benn1993
Lp 54 59.59 (0.1035) cm total length at puberty fishbase
Li 110 124.5 (0.1315) cm ultimate total length Benn1993
Wwb 0.00032 0.0003196 (0.00123) g wet weight at birth fishbase
Wwp 2861 2721 (0.04904) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 2.5e+04 2.479e+04 (0.008475) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
GSI 0.05 0.0495 (0.009915) g/g gonado-somatic index guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LL length at t=0 length at t=62 d (0.06683) HarrCook1995
LW length at t=0 weight at t=0
weight at t=62 d
(0.09252) HarrCook1995
tL time since birth fork length (0.08701) Benn1993

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Lithognathus lithognathus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01856 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 27.68 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3775 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.8319 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8006 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed not to differ from females

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.01549*(TL in cm)^3.04 (Ref: fishbase)
  • known only from the Orange River mouth to Natal, South Africa (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation