Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: A migrate: Ms phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: TPa food: biCi, biCvr class:
MRE = 0.032 habitat: 0iTs, 0iTa, 0iTd gender: Dg order:
SMSE = 0.002 embryo: Tncfm reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 23 24.14 (0.04945) d age at birth guess
tx 55 54.87 (0.002323) d time since birth at fledging guess
tp 165 155.7 (0.05644) d time since birth at puberty guess
tR 730 730 ( 0) d time since birth at 1st brood guess
am 5584 5566 (0.003346) d life span guess
Wwb 36.4 35.01 (0.03818) g wet weight at birth Conr2020
Wwi 583 605.6 (0.03871) g ultimate wet weight for females avibase
Ri 0.008219 0.008069 (0.01831) #/d maximum reprod rate avibase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tW time since birth wet weight (0.0577) Conr2020

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Lophotibis cristata Unit Description
v 0.02 0.04 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 634.4 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.02855 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3283 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.8002 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8028 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • scaled functional response turned out to vary, which has been implemented
  • mod_1: Pseudo-data point k is used, rather than k_J; Data set tp and parameter t_R are added, the latter replacing clutch interval t_N. Postnatal T is based on PrinPres1991, see get_T_Aves. See further the revision page, theme puberty

Bibliography

Citation