Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MAW food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.088 habitat: 0jMp, jiMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.012 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 6.5 6.562 (0.009561) d age at birth guess
am 1.533e+04 1.457e+04 (0.04928) d life span fishbase
Lp 25 25.15 (0.005931) cm fork length at puberty guess
Li 79.1 75.06 (0.05103) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.00025 0.000273 (0.09208) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 210 231.4 (0.1021) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Wwi 6420 6155 (0.0413) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 975.3 1067 (0.09355) #/d max reoduction rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.1161) PottBurt2016
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.1193) PottBurt2016

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Lutjanus apodus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01852 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 6.185 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.000392 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3339 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.964 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7942 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed not to differ from females

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.01479*(TL in cm)^2.97 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation