Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MPE food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.053 habitat: 0jMp, jiMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.005 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 7.5 6.304 (0.1594) d age at birth guess
am 5840 5811 (0.004938) d life span Ramo2001
Lp 19.5 19.15 (0.01804) cm fork length at puberty guess
Li 71 69.1 (0.02678) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.00025 0.0002668 (0.06733) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 100.3 98.01 (0.02287) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Wwi 4658 4606 (0.01127) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 975.3 1008 (0.03396) #/d max reoduction rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth total length (0.09048) GarcQuin2009

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Lutjanus argentiventris Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02152 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 5.907 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0003333 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.296 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.955 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7977 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
s_s 0.01 0.0003422 - supply stress

Discussion

  • males are supposed not to differ from females

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.01479*(TL in cm)^2.97 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation