Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MAW food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.029 habitat: 0jMp, jiMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.002 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 7.5 7.368 (0.01754) d age at birth guess
am 2.008e+04 1.997e+04 (0.004985) d life span fishbase
Lp 80 78.5 (0.01869) cm fork length at puberty guess
Li 160 155.9 (0.02569) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.00025 0.00025 (0.0001044) g wet weight at birth HeymKjer2005
Wwp 6041 6040 (0.0002201) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Wwi 4.766e+04 4.729e+04 (0.007834) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
GSI 0.058 0.05773 (0.004578) - gonado somatic index guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth fork length (0.04118) BurtPott2017

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Lutjanus cyanopterus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01607 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 3.411 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0001931 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.2965 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.7977 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7991 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed not to differ from females

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.01288*(TL in cm)^2.98 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation