Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MI, MPW food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.029 habitat: 0jMp, jiMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.002 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 4.5 4.592 (0.02054) d age at birth guess
am 1.241e+04 1.241e+04 (0.0002475) d life span fishbase
Lp 20.6 20.67 (0.003324) cm fork length at puberty for females fishbase
Li 40 39.86 (0.003453) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.00032 0.0003206 (0.001774) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 124 123.8 (0.001691) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Wwi 888 888 (5.212e-05) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 258.9 259.2 (0.001109) #/d max reprod rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_fm time since birth fork length (0.04983) ShimNana2014

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Lutjanus fulvus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01992 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 17.87 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.001028 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3009 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.97 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8001 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.01549*(TL in cm)^2.97 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation