Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MI, MP food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.037 habitat: 0jMp, jiMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.004 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 3 3.353 (0.1178) d age at birth uwi
am 6570 6573 (0.0003997) d life span uwi
Lp 21.5 21.51 (0.0004109) cm fork length at puberty for females fishbase
Li 56.8 56.76 (0.0006164) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.00038 0.0003799 (0.0001942) g wet weight at birth PrihKama2020
Wwp 140 413.9 (1.957) g wet weight at puberty HeupCurr2009, fishbase
Wwi 2515 7609 (2.025) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
GSI 0.015 0.01501 (0.0005995) - gonado somatic index PrihKama2020

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LW fork length weight (0.08675) HeupCurr2009
tL time since birth fork length (0.06382) HeupCurr2009

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Lutjanus gibbus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02158 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 24.83 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.4207 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9851 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8011 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Data Wwp and Wwi ignonerd due to inconsistency with LW data

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.01549*(TL in cm)^2.97 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation