Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: MB, MC migrate: Mdc phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MAbl food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.052 habitat: jiFm, 0iMm gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.008 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 4015 4014 (0.0001491) d life span guess
Lp 10.5 10.16 (0.03251) cm total length at puberty guess
Li 21.9 22.06 (0.007257) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 6.5e-05 6.342e-05 (0.02425) g ultimate wet weight guess
Wwp 11.6 11.68 (0.006839) g wet weight at puberty guess, fishbase
Wwi 112 119.6 (0.0677) g ultimate wet weight for females fishbase
Ri 4384 4069 (0.07165) #/d max reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LW_f Data for females, males total length weight (0.1333) CiloAkgu2019
LW_m Data for females, males total length weight (0.1361) CiloAkgu2019
tL_fm time since birth total length (0.04327) CiloAkgu2019
tW_fm time since birth weight (0.123) CiloAkgu2019

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Mullus ponticus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02576 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 32.31 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3231 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.3694 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8015 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • a fecundity of 9e6 eggs seems a lot for a 22 cm fish

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.00832*(TL in cm)^3.08 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation