Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA, MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.3 ecozone: MC food: biPz class:
MRE = 0.042 habitat: 0jMpe, jiMp gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.004 embryo: Mpe reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 3285 3288 (0.0007827) d life span GiraOvc2011
Lp 6 5.538 (0.07704) cm standard length fat puberty guess
Li 8.3 9.867 (0.1888) cm ultimate standard length fishbase
Wwb 1.4e-05 1.38e-05 (0.01428) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 33.1 34.39 (0.03885) g wet weight at puberty guess, fishbase
Wwi 201 194.5 (0.03234) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 21.92 21.7 (0.01002) #/d max reprod rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth standard length (0.02783) GiraOvc2011

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Myctophum nitidulum Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02569 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 34.71 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3006 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9987 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.802 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed not to differ from females
  • scaled functional response for tL data is high, but measured length exceeds L_m

Facts

  • Length-Weight relationship: W in g = 0.00912*(SL in cm)^3.12 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation