Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: Am migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.6 ecozone: TPa food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.088 habitat: 0iFpe gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.024 embryo: Ft reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 15 15.15 (0.01003) d age at birth BlazPola2013
tp 11.5 10.81 (0.05966) d time since birth at puberty BlazPola2013
am 112 108.5 (0.03148) d life span BlazPola2013
Lb 0.51 0.519 (0.01755) cm total length at birth BlazPola2013
Lp 2.22 2.19 (0.01357) cm total length at puberty BlazPola2013
Li 5 4.632 (0.07366) cm ultimate total length for females BlazPola2013
Lim 6 5.554 (0.07428) cm ultimate total length for males BlazPola2013
Wwb 0.000905 0.0008466 (0.06456) g wet weight at birth BeroGarc2016
Wwi 0.59 0.6019 (0.0201) g ultimate wet weight for female fishbase
Wwim 1.15 1.121 (0.02519) g ultimate wet weight for male fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_fNK91 Data for females, males population NK91 time since birth total length (0.07898) BlazPola2013
tL_mNK91 Data for females, males population NK91 time since birth total length (0.08546) BlazPola2013
tL_fNK430 time since birth total length (0.05874) BlazPola2013
tL_mNK430 time since birth total length (0.1249) BlazPola2013
tN_NK91 time since birth cum reproduction (0.3878) BlazPola2013
tN_NK430 time since birth cum reproduction (0.3164) BlazPola2013

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Nothobranchius kadleci Unit Description
v 0.02 0.1652 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 683.9 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.01529 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9526 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8002 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww = 0.00389 * (TL in cm)3.12 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation