Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: Cfa migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.6 ecozone: THn food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.038 habitat: 0iFr, 0iFc gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.002 embryo: Fg reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 1460 1459 (0.0004014) d life span fishbase
Lp 2.56 2.565 (0.001836) cm standard length at puberty for females KnigRoss1992
Li 4.8 4.381 (0.08724) cm ultimate standard length fishbase
Wwb 0.0012 0.001216 (0.01297) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwi 1.1 1.08 (0.01839) g ultimate wet weight fishbase, IrwiFolt2012
GSI 0.15 0.1501 (0.0004491) - gonado somatic index KnigRoss1992

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth standard length (0.02672) KnigRoss1992
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth standard length (0.04291) KnigRoss1992

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Nothonotus rubrus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02072 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.9493 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 54.24 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8019 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by E_Hp only
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.00513 * (TL in cm)^3.14 (Ref: fishbase)
  • length-length: TL = 1.15 * SL (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation