Predictions & Data for this entry
| Model: stf | climate: MB, MC | migrate: Ma | phylum: |
| COMPLETE = 2.5 | ecozone: MAS, MP, MI | food: biCi, biCvf | class: |
| MRE = 0.058 | habitat: 0iMpb | gender: D | order: |
| SMSE = 0.009 | embryo: Mv | reprod: O | family: |
Zero-variate data
| Data | Observed | Predicted | (RE) | Unit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ab | 366 | 359.3 | (0.01838) | d | age at birth | fishbase |
| am | 1.788e+04 | 1.791e+04 | (0.001185) | d | life span | fishbase |
| Lb | 46 | 46.92 | (0.01996) | cm | total length at birth | fishbase |
| Lp | 150 | 149.2 | (0.005407) | cm | total length at puberty for females | ADW |
| Lpm | 192 | 191 | (0.005123) | cm | total length at puberty for males | ADW |
| Li | 300 | 334.5 | (0.1151) | cm | ultimate total length for females | fishbase |
| Ri | 0.1164 | 0.1141 | (0.02002) | #/d | maximum reprod rate | fishbase |
Uni- and bivariate data
| Data | Figure | Independent variable | Dependent variable | (RE) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LWw |  | total length | wet weight | (0.1073) | DijkhMoll1992 |
| tL |  | time since birth | total length | (0.1144) | DijkhMoll1992 |
Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C
| Data | Generalised animal | Notorynchus cepedianus | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v | 0.02 | 0.06249 | cm/d | energy conductance |
| p_M | 18 | 30.19 | J/d.cm^3 | vol-spec som maint |
| k_J | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1/d | maturity maint rate coefficient |
| k | 0.3 | 0.3458 | - | maintenance ratio |
| kap | 0.8 | 0.5522 | - | allocation fraction to soma |
| kap_G | 0.8 | 0.8016 | - | growth efficiency |
| kap_R | 0.95 | 0.95 | - | reproduction efficiency |
Discussion
- males are assumed to differ from females by E_Hp only
- Temperatures are guessed
- Ovoviviparous and histotrophic, therefore the stf model was applied
Bibliography