Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: EF migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.4 ecozone: MASW, MPSE food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.029 habitat: 0jMp, jiMcd gender: Hsm order:
SMSE = 0.002 embryo: Mpe reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 89 88.88 (0.001293) d age at birth guess
am 6570 6582 (0.001828) d life span Ever1970
Lp 30 31.65 (0.0549) cm total length fishbase
Li 45 42.58 (0.05382) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.0009 0.0008998 (0.0002234) g wet weight at birth fishbase
Wwp 828 816.7 (0.0137) g wet weight at puberty for females fishbase
Wwi 1870 1989 (0.06355) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 95.89 96.2 (0.00321) #/d max reproduction rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tW_fm time since birth weight (0.03101) Ever1970

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Notothenia neglecta Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02399 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 114.2 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.0914 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9475 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8018 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed to differ from felmales by {p_Am} only

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.00794*(TL in cm)^3.25 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation