Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: hep climate: A, C migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 3.2 ecozone: TP food: biHn, biCi class:
MRE = 0.156 habitat: biTh gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.044 embryo: Thl reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
Wwb 3.7e-06 1.642e-06 (0.5561) g wet weight at birth Kopp2025, Wiki, ArijPatr2001
Wwi 0.000618 0.0007406 (0.1984) g asymptotic wet weight guess
Ni 150 141.3 (0.05816) # total fecundity SancLaca2002

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tN35 Data for 35, 30, 25, 20 C time since start imago cumulative reproduction (0.1329) SancLaca2002
tN30 Data for 35, 30, 25, 20 C time since start imago cumulative reproduction (0.05799) SancLaca2002
tN25 Data for 35, 30, 25, 20 C time since start imago cumulative reproduction (0.06716) SancLaca2002
tN20 Data for 35, 30, 25, 20 C time since start imago cumulative reproduction (0.07895) SancLaca2002
tS35 time since start imago surviving fraction (0.1909) SancLaca2002
tS30 time since start imago surviving fraction (0.2229) SancLaca2002
tS25 time since start imago surviving fraction (0.1524) SancLaca2002
tS20 time since start imago surviving fraction (0.167) SancLaca2002
LWj_f imago pronotum width imago wet weight (0.04638) DeclArij2005
LWj_m imago pronotum width imago wet weight (0.06444) DeclArij2005
T12 temperature duration of instar 2 (0.2786) SancLaca2002, AlauDarg1994, CocuCler1997
T23 temperature duration of instar 3 (0.0996) SancLaca2002, AlauDarg1994, CocuCler1997
T3p temperature duration of instar 4 (0.193) SancLaca2002, AlauDarg1994, CocuCler1997
TN temperature total fecundity (0.2283) SancLaca2002, AlauDarg1994
Tab temperature age at birth (0.3864) SancLaca2002, AlauDarg1994, CocuCler1997
Taj temperature age at imago (0.1407) SancLaca2002, AlauDarg1994, CocuCler1997
Tb1 temperature duration of instar 1 (0.1992) SancLaca2002, AlauDarg1994, CocuCler1997
Tji_fm temperature duration of imago (0.6534) SancLaca2002, CocuCler1997, AlauDarg1994
Tpj temperature duration of instar 5 (0.3735) SancLaca2002, AlauDarg1994, CocuCler1997
XLj_fm food density imago pronotum width (0.158) GallRodr2022
X_12 food density duration of instar 2 (0.07364) GallRodr2022
X_23 food density duration of instar 3 (0.06638) GallRodr2022
X_3p food density duration of instar 4 (0.1575) GallRodr2022
X_b1 food density duration of instar 1 (0.1051) GallRodr2022
X_pj food density duration of instar 5 (0.3742) GallRodr2022

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Orius laevigatus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.03138 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 5031 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.001733 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9233 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8158 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed to differ from females by {p_Am} and h_a only
  • model hep is applied: period bp acceleration, pj isomorphic growth, allocation to reprod, ji no growth or allocation to reprod
  • growth data suggests a 3 parameter Arrhenius model, but survival a 1 parameter one
  • reproduction efficiency depends on temperature different from growth and survival
  • SancLaca2002, CocuCler1997 and ArijPatr2001 mean with "adult" imago, instar 5 is pj (DEB adult), and "egg to adult" is bj

Facts

  • Development stages: egg, instars 1 to 5, followed by the imago (Ref: Kopp2025)

Bibliography

Citation