Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: stx climate: BSk, Csa, Cfb, Dfb migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.9 ecozone: THp, TA food: bxM, xiH class:
MRE = 0.042 habitat: 0iTg, 0iTs gender: Dg order:
SMSE = 0.009 embryo: Tv reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
tg 31.5 37.89 (0.203) d gestation time FootCarn2000
tx 35 35.07 (0.002136) d time since birth at weaning FootCarn2000
tp 168 93.24 (0.445) d time since birth at puberty - females FootCarn2000
tp2 91 93.24 (0.02467) d time since birth at puberty - females (youngest females in exp) BayeXXXX
tp_m 140 141 (0.006821) d time since birth at puberty - males FootCarn2000
am 3285 3658 (0.1137) d life span AnAge
Lb 8 12.14 (0.5174) cm kit crown-rump length ResearchGate
Li 50 41.53 (0.1695) cm ultimate crown-rump length wiki
Wwb 53.57 39.2 (0.2682) g wet weight at birth - New Zealand FootCarn2000, FadaFato2018, AporHaga2014
Wwp 2720 2597 (0.04509) g wet weight at puberty - New Zealand - females BayeXXXX
Wwi 5000 5173 (0.03454) g ultimate wet weight - females FootCarn2000
Wwi_m 5500 5301 (0.03621) g ultimate wet weight - males FootCarn2000
Ri 0.08904 0.1416 (0.5899) #/d maximum reprod rate HolsHutz2002

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tWw_1 BergChaz1976 MALE, and MasoShap1986 MALES and FEMALES time since birth wet weight (0.2128) BergChaz1976
tWw_2 BergChaz1976 MALE, and MasoShap1986 MALES and FEMALES time since birth wet weight (0.03207) MasoShap1986
tWw_3 BergChaz1976 MALE, and MasoShap1986 MALES and FEMALES time since birth wet weight (0.03413) MasoShap1986
tL time since birth nose-to-tibia length (0.02863) MasoShap1986
tL2 time since birth nose-to-tibia length (0.02981) MasoShap1986
tWw_4 time since birth wet weight - Males (0.1667) Mahm2013
tWw_5 time since birth wet weight - Males (0.1437) Mahm2013
tWw_6 time since birth wet weight - Females (0.1707) Mahm2013
tWw_7 time since birth wet weight - Females (0.2134) Mahm2013
tWw_0154 time of experiment wet weight female (0.02278) Baye1999a
tWw_0192 time of experiment wet weight female (0.01718) Baye1995
tWw_1085 time of experiment wet weight female (0.009174) Baye2003
tWw_0397 time of experiment wet weight female (0.01346) Baye1999b
tWw_0203 time of experiment wet weight female (0.01229) Baye1988
tJX_0154 time of experiment ingestion rate (0.4369) Baye1999a
tJX_0192 time of experiment ingestion rate (0.1733) Baye1995
tJX_1085 time of experiment ingestion rate (0.125) Baye2003
tJX_0397 time of experiment ingestion rate (0.2295) Baye1999b
tJX_0203 time of experiment ingestion rate (0.6089) Baye1988
WwN_0154 wet weight at insemination litter size (0.2734) Baye1999a
WwN_0192 wet weight at insemination litter size (0.2764) Baye1995
WwN_1085 wet weight at insemination litter size (0.2694) Baye2003
tW_e2 age wet weight of foetus (0.2352) ZaikDom2013
tWwe_Baye age wet weight of foetus (0.149) BayeXXXX

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Oryctolagus cuniculus NZW Unit Description
v 0.02 0.03803 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.7846 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 1576 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8016 - growth efficiency
t_0 0 1.326e-06 d time at start development

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
  • Different to version : Added data on pregnant females, and dget_EVH_AF to derive their dynamics. We assumed no saturating function of litter size (Seff = del_upreg). For an example of saturating function see Wistar rat entry.
  • To avoid negative growth (shrinking), a condition dV = max( 0,pG/E_G ) in inserted in get_EVH_AF;
  • Rabbit entry needs a bit more work and adjustment of the equations relating to pregnancy, as well as to feeding because coprophagia(eating of foeces) should perhaps be explicitly modelled if ingestion data are of interest. For foetal development, more data on foetal length and weight is needed, as it is currently impossible to know whether a constant body composition is maintained throughout foetaldevelopment (resulting in constant reserve density) or reserve density fluctuates depending on the condition of the mother or number of siblings in a litter.
  • Parameter estimation is slow due to the code complexity; with more continuations a different parameter set might be obtained.

Acknowledgment

  • This entry (version 2019/12/12) was financially supported by Bayer.

Bibliography

Citation