Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: A, MA migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: TPi, MI, MPSW food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.100 habitat: 0jFl, jiFr, piMc gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.040 embryo: Fp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 1.095e+04 1.158e+04 (0.05717) d life span guess
Lp 19.6 16.03 (0.182) cm total length at puberty fishbase
Li 34 29.57 (0.1304) cm ultimate total length BhakDas2021
Wwb 0.00022 0.0002126 (0.03351) g wet weight at puberty BhakDas2021
Wwp 54 48.75 (0.09718) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 289 305.8 (0.05798) g ultimate wet weight fishbase, BhakDas2021

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LN fork length fecundity (0.6791) BhakDas2021
tL time since birth total length (0.02344) MustAhme2020

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Otolithoides pama Unit Description
v 0.02 0.022 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 25.31 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.4103 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9665 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8058 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Li (and Wwi) data were ignored due to inconsistency with Lp and tL data

Facts

  • length-weight: W in g = 0.00617*(TL in cm)^3.05 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation