Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MPW food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.067 habitat: 0jMp, jiMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.009 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 2.19e+04 2.189e+04 (0.0002735) d life span UehaEbis2020
Lp 30 29.99 (0.0004149) cm fork length at puberty for females guess
Li 50 51.23 (0.02451) cm ultimate fork length for females fishbase
Wwb 0.00032 0.0003049 (0.04725) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 403 400 (0.007322) g wet weight at puberty guess, fishbase
Wwi 1914 1994 (0.04186) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 4658 4504 (0.03292) #/d max reoduction rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.09586) UehaEbis2020
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.1023) UehaEbis2020

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Paracaesio caerulea Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02629 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 29.1 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.00161 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.289 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.5779 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8011 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed not to differ from females

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.01259*(TL in cm )^3.05 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation