Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: Ma phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.1 ecozone: MAW food: biPz class:
MRE = 0.034 habitat: 0iMc gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.003 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 7.5 7.311 (0.02515) d age at birth guess
am 1825 1846 (0.01174) d life span VazdRoss2019
Lp 9 8.996 (0.000491) cm total length at puberty guess
Li 18 17.89 (0.005866) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.000268 0.0002758 (0.02903) g dry weight at birth guess
Wwp 6 6.105 (0.01756) g wet weight at puberty guess, fishbase
Wwi 49 48.06 (0.0192) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 11.16 11.44 (0.02474) #/d maximum reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth total length (0.07035) VazdRoss2019

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Pellona harroweri Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01885 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 7.568 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0005006 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3475 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9718 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7966 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed not to differ from females
  • I has to reduce estimate age in tL data with 50 d to arrive at a natural fit

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.00794*(TL in cm)^3.02 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation