Predictions & Data for this entry
Model: std | climate: Dfa, Dfb, BSk | migrate: TT | phylum: |
COMPLETE = 2.5 | ecozone: THp | food: biCi | class: |
MRE = 0.126 | habitat: 0jFp, jiTs, jiTf, jiTg | gender: Dg | order: |
SMSE = 0.031 | embryo: Fh | reprod: O | family: |
Zero-variate data
Data | Observed | Predicted | (RE) | Unit | Description | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ab | 8 | 7.708 | (0.03646) | d | age at birth | Noll1984 |
tj | 85 | 157 | (0.8466) | d | time since birth at metam | Noll1984 |
tp | 1132 | 965.1 | (0.1471) | d | time since metam at puberty for females | CogaRosi2014 |
am | 5110 | 5110 | (1.331e-05) | d | life span | CogaRosi2014 |
Lb | 0.2 | 0.2001 | (0.0003345) | cm | total length at birth | Noll1984 |
Lj | 3.261 | 3.124 | (0.04207) | cm | SVL of frog at metam | SchmHodl2012 |
Lp | 4.2 | 4.672 | (0.1124) | cm | SVL at puberty for females | CogaRosi2014 |
Li | 6 | 6.437 | (0.07291) | cm | ultimate SVL for females | CogaRosi2014 |
Lim | 4.7 | 4.601 | (0.0211) | cm | ultimate SVL for males | CogaRosi2014 |
Wd0 | 0.00096 | 0.0009585 | (0.001564) | g | dry weight of an egg | YermMikh2016 |
Wwj | 4.46 | 3.724 | (0.165) | g | dry weight of an egg | SchmHodl2012 |
Wwp | 10 | 12.46 | (0.246) | g | wet weight at puberty for females | CogaRosi2014 |
Wwi | 34 | 32.59 | (0.04138) | g | ultimate wet weight for females | CogaRosi2014 |
Wwim | 11 | 11.36 | (0.03263) | g | ultimate wet weight for males | CogaRosi2014 |
Ri | 8.219 | 7.075 | (0.1392) | #/d | maximum reprod rate | EoL |
Uni- and bivariate data
Data | Figure | Independent variable | Dependent variable | (RE) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
tL_f | time since metam | SVL | (0.1069) | CogaRosi2014 | |
tL_m | time since metam | SVL | (0.03908) | CogaRosi2014 | |
LW_f | SVL | wet weight | (0.1725) | CogaRosi2014 | |
LW_m | SVL | wet weight | (0.1688) | CogaRosi2014 | |
tL | time since hatch | total length | (0.1239) | Noll1984 |
Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C
Data | Generalised animal | Pelobates fuscus | Unit | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
v | 0.02 | 0.1167 | cm/d | energy conductance |
kap | 0.8 | 0.7752 | - | allocation fraction to soma |
kap_R | 0.95 | 0.95 | - | reproduction efficiency |
p_M | 18 | 36.55 | J/d.cm^3 | vol-spec som maint |
k_J | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1/d | maturity maint rate coefficient |
kap_G | 0.8 | 0.8026 | - | growth efficiency |
Discussion
- tadpoles are assumed to differ from frogs by del_M only; mod_2: tadpoles have varying shape coefficient.
- mod_0 and mod_1: males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only. mod_2: males and females differ by {p_Am} only. Data for ages, lenghts and weights at puberty hardly differed, so are not longer included as different.
- mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females
- mod_2: added different f for tL_f and tL_m. Added a single functional response for tadpole stage (as opposed to having it vary), added new data: dry weight of egg and wet weight at metamorphosis. Double checked the incubation time and temperature.
Bibliography