Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: Cfb, Dfb, Dfc migrate: Mp phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.8 ecozone: THp food: biD, biHa class:
MRE = 0.028 habitat: 0iFc gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.002 embryo: Fg reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 4745 4759 (0.002985) d lifespan MuseBorg2002
Lp 5.1 5.001 (0.01932) cm Fork length at puberty fishbase
Li 11.5 11.57 (0.006483) cm ultimate total length MarkCale2017
Wwb 0.0052 0.004986 (0.04111) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 1.3 1.292 (0.006501) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 15.7 16.01 (0.0196) g ultimate wet weight MarkCale2017, fishbase
Ri 2.74 2.661 (0.02868) #/d max reproduction guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth total length (0.0988) MarkCale2017

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Phoxinellus pseudalepidotus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.0211 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 219.5 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.04756 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.8724 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8015 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed not to differ from females

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.00813*(TL in cm)^3.10 (Ref: fishbase)
  • Neretva drainage in Bosnia-Herzegovina (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation