Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: BSk, BSh migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THn food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.032 habitat: 0iTf, 0iTh gender: Dg order:
SMSE = 0.003 embryo: Tv reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
tp 730 94.65 (0.8703) d time since birth at puberty idaho
tpm 365 365 (8.667e-06) d time since birth at puberty idaho
am 3650 3650 (7.052e-05) d life span
Wwb 0.8 0.7968 (0.004062) g wet at birth Laht2010
Wwp 10 10 (0.0003262) g wet at puberty for females Laht2010
Wwi 36 36.81 (0.02238) g ultimate wet Mont1983
Ri 0.02466 0.02469 (0.001178) #/d maximum reprod rate EoL

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tW time since birth weight (0.07117) Mont1983

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Phrynosoma douglasii Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02685 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.9674 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 105.5 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.801 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by E_Hp only
  • scaled functional response turned out to vary during handrearing
  • tp ignored, due to inconsistency of (tp,Wwp) with tW data

Facts

  • Ovoviviparous (Ref: natmap)

Bibliography

Citation