Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: A migrate: Mp phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: TN food: biHs class:
MRE = 0.038 habitat: biFr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.006 embryo: Fnf reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 7.5 4.774 (0.3635) d age at birth guess
am 2920 2917 (0.001095) d life span AmbrBalb2014
Lp 25 25.05 (0.002177) cm total length at puberty guess
Li 40.5 41 (0.01246) cm ultimate std length fishbase
Wwb 0.00052 0.0005193 (0.001256) g wet weight at birth guess
GSI 0.2 0.2007 (0.003521) g/g gonado somatic index for female guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LW_f Data for females, males std length weight (0.1473) AmbrBalb2014
LW_m Data for females, males std length weight (0.1784) AmbrBalb2014
tL_fm time since birth total length (0.03056) AmbrBalb2014

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Piaractus mesopotamicus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02512 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 25.33 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.4126 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.813 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8008 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.02455*(TL in cm)^3.00, but at odds with Wwi = 20 kg, which seems large of a 40 cm fish (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation