Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MI, MPW food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.070 habitat: 0jMp, jiMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.009 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 5 5.247 (0.04934) d age at birth guess
am 4015 4021 (0.001576) d life span guess
Lp 40 40.11 (0.002834) cm fork length at puberty fishbase
Li 83 81.62 (0.01661) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.00032 0.0003188 (0.003667) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 855 849.6 (0.006304) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Wwi 7153 7158 (0.0006404) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
GSI 0.058 0.05738 (0.01072) g/g gonado somatic index guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_fm time since birth fork length (0.1141) AlOgHuss1990

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Plectorhinchus pictus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02153 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 16.01 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0009368 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3063 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9501 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7996 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
s_s 0.01 0.002765 - supply stress

Discussion

  • males are supposed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.01862*(TL in cm)^2.91 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation