Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MI, MPW food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.061 habitat: 0jMp, jiMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.009 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 5 4.283 (0.1434) d age at birth guess
am 4015 3973 (0.01056) d life span fishbase
Lp 26 26.39 (0.01484) cm fork length at puberty fishbase
Li 60 60.64 (0.01069) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.00032 0.0003203 (0.0009025) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 238 237.4 (0.002712) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Wwi 2876 2881 (0.001832) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
GSI 0.058 0.05853 (0.009081) - gonado somatic index GranAbde2011

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.09726) GranAbde2011
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.1008) GranAbde2011

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Plectorhinchus sordidus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02153 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 37.37 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002173 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3034 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9741 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8021 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.01445*(TL in cm)^2.98 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation