Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MAE food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.038 habitat: 0jMp, jiMm gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.003 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 8.5 8.674 (0.02048) d age at birth guess
am 6570 6570 (8.255e-06) d life span AbelSant2001
Lp 22.6 22.45 (0.00654) cm total length at puberty MendEsta1998
Lpm 29.9 30.07 (0.005677) cm total length at puberty for males MendEsta1998
Li 38.4 41.24 (0.07397) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Lim 52 50.06 (0.03721) cm ultimate total length for males fishbase
Wwb 0.00027 0.0002443 (0.09515) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwi 732 781.8 (0.068) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 1644 1563 (0.04897) #/d max reproduction rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_fm time since birth total length (0.03893) AbelSant2001

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Pontinus kuhlii Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02135 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 89.45 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.1167 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.7212 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8019 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
  • I had to subtract 3 yrs from age-estimates in tL data and to ignore Li to arrive at a reasonable fit

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.01202*(TL in cm)^3.02 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation