Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MI, MPW food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.007 habitat: 0jMp, jiMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.000 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 3650 3642 (0.002212) d life span guess
Lp 22 22.3 (0.01374) cm fork length at puberty fishbase
Li 45 44.33 (0.0149) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 7.4e-05 7.396e-05 (0.0005951) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 130.6 130.7 (0.0006689) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 1026 1026 (0.0002609) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 672.1 670.9 (0.00179) #/d maximum reprod rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth fork length (0.0101) Chak1994

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Priacanthus hamrur Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02128 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 26.91 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.389 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9903 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7996 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed not to differ from females

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.01778*(TL in cm)^2.88 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation