Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MIE, MPW food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.018 habitat: 0jMp, jiMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.000 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 3650 3707 (0.01568) d life span guess
Lp 21.1 21.51 (0.01958) cm fork length at puberty fishbase
Li 35 35.55 (0.01569) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 7.4e-05 7.243e-05 (0.02127) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 148 144.9 (0.02097) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 642.4 653.8 (0.0177) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 672.1 662.9 (0.01357) #/d maximum reprod rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth fork length (0.01752) SilvGarc2001

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Priacanthus tayenus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02128 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 26.91 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3882 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9776 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8012 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.02138*(TL in cm)^2.90 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation