Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: MB migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MI, MPSW food: jiCie class:
MRE = 0.042 habitat: 0jMp, jiMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.003 embryo: Mnf reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 1825 1810 (0.008007) d life span guess
Lp 14 14.51 (0.03642) cm total length at puberty fishbase
Li 30 28.26 (0.0579) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.000195 0.0001965 (0.007761) g wet weight at birth MacK2008
Wwi 762.6 1291 (0.693) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 178.1 180.2 (0.01198) #/d max reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.09434) KunzTach2012
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.08819) KunzTach2012
LW fork length weight (0.1209) KunzTach2012
tL_fm time since birth fork length (0.03963) KunzTach2012

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Rhinecanthus aculeatus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02075 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 18.36 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.5694 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9894 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8003 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.03236*(TL in cm)^2.96 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation