Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: Am migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: TN food: biCi, piO class:
MRE = 0.035 habitat: 0bTd, biFp, biFl, biFr gender: Dg order:
SMSE = 0.004 embryo: Tt reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 1.46e+04 1.46e+04 (9.228e-05) d life span guess
Lb 3 3.006 (0.002044) cm carapace length at birth guess
Lp 8 8.002 (0.0002152) cm carapace length at puberty MagnLima1997
Li 21.7 21.91 (0.009498) cm ultimate carapace length MagnLima1997
Lim 21.5 21.42 (0.003586) cm ultimate carapace length MagnLima1997
Wwi 2394 2399 (0.002106) g ultimate wet weight EoL
Ri 0.02192 0.02194 (0.0009208) #/d maximum reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LL_f carapace length at capture carapace length at recapture (0.038) MagnLima1997
LL_m carapace length at capture carapace length at recapture (0.07622) MagnLima1997

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Rhinemys rufipes Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01893 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.9675 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 16.81 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.001369 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.7998 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed not to differ fro females
  • age at puberty is ignored because it is incosistent with Lp combined with tL data

Bibliography

Citation