Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: MB migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MI, MPW food: biCi, biCvf class:
MRE = 0.096 habitat: 0iMcd gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.025 embryo: Mv reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 4380 4379 (0.0001272) d life span WhitSimp2014
Lb 48 45.38 (0.05463) cm total length at birth WhitSimp2014
Lp 130 122.3 (0.05935) cm total length at puberty fishbase
Li 270 270.6 (0.002101) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 685 693.3 (0.0121) g wet weight at birth fishbase, WhitSimp2014
Wwp 1.33e+04 1.357e+04 (0.02011) g wet weight at puberty fishbase, WhitSimp2014
Wwi 1.5e+05 1.47e+05 (0.02026) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 0.03836 0.03821 (0.003717) #/d maximum reprod rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth total length (0.2162) WhitSimp2014

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Rhynchobatus laevis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01681 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.7791 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 14.71 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.001998 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.7996 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • males and females are assumed not to differ
  • Temperatures are guessed, based in preferred temperature as given in fishbase
  • R. palpebratus and R. laevis could not be distinguised, so this entry may be a mix of both species

Facts

  • ovoviviparous (Ref: fishbase)
  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.00389*(TL in cm)^3.12 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation