Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: Dwa, Dfa migrate: Mp phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THn food: biCi, piCvf class:
MRE = 0.021 habitat: 0iFr, 0iFl, 0iFe gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.001 embryo: Fnm reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 15 14.29 (0.04762) d age at birth fishbase
am 1.058e+04 1.042e+04 (0.01524) d life span fishbase
Lp 36 36.09 (0.002403) cm total length at puberty for females fishbase
Li 107 107.1 (0.001033) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.00038 0.0003884 (0.02211) g wet weight at birth Aart2007
Wwp 430 430 (6.551e-06) g wet weight at puberty for females fishbase
Wwi 1.13e+04 1.124e+04 (0.004939) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 1677 1686 (0.005327) g Reprod rate max size fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.02216) HeRuds2005
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.03384) HeRuds2005

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Sander vitreus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01502 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.958 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 20.57 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002112 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8002 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Bibliography

Citation