Predictions & Data for this entry
| Model: std | climate: Cfa, Cfb, Dfa, Dfb, Dfc | migrate: | phylum: |
| COMPLETE = 2.7 | ecozone: TH | food: biPp, biD | class: |
| MRE = 0.133 | habitat: 0iFp, 0iFl, 0iFm | gender: D | order: |
| SMSE = 0.040 | embryo: Tbf | reprod: Apf | family: |
Zero-variate data
| Data | Observed | Predicted | (RE) | Unit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wdi | 21 | 20.63 | (0.01739) | mug | ultimate dry weight | LemkBenk2003 |
Uni- and bivariate data
| Data | Figure | Independent variable | Dependent variable | (RE) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tL_25 |   | time since birth | length | (0.08147) | LemkBenk2003 |
| tL_20 | | time since birth | length | (0.04535) | LemkBenk2003 |
| tL_15 | | time since birth | length | (0.02266) | LemkBenk2003 |
| tL_10 | | time since birth | length | (0.05891) | LemkBenk2003 |
| tN_25 |   | time since birth | cumulative # of eggs | (0.2378) | LemkBenk2003 |
| tN_20 | | time since birth | cumulative # of eggs | (0.3022) | LemkBenk2003 |
| tN_15 | | time since birth | cumulative # of eggs | (0.272) | LemkBenk2003 |
| tN_10 | | time since birth | cumulative # of eggs | (0.2732) | LemkBenk2003 |
| tS_25 |   | time since birth | surviving fraction | (0.1995) | LemkBenk2003 |
| tS_20 | | time since birth | surviving fraction | (0.1763) | LemkBenk2003 |
| tS_15 | | time since birth | surviving fraction | (0.03661) | LemkBenk2003 |
| tS_10 | | time since birth | surviving fraction | (0.01831) | LemkBenk2003 |
| Ttp |  | temperature | time since birth at puberty | (0.163) | LemkBenk2003 |
Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C
| Data | Generalised animal | Scapholeberis mucronata | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v | 0.02 | 0.0365 | cm/d | energy conductance |
| p_M | 18 | 1400 | J/d.cm^3 | vol-spec som maint |
| k_J | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1/d | maturity maint rate coefficient |
| k | 0.3 | 0.006306 | - | maintenance ratio |
| kap | 0.8 | 0.905 | - | allocation fraction to soma |
| kap_G | 0.8 | 0.8057 | - | growth efficiency |
| kap_R | 0.95 | 0.95 | - | reproduction efficiency |
Discussion
- Bad fit of Wdi is ignored, in favour of a typical value for del_M, on the basis of W propto L^1.4, which seems unrealistic
- tN data has been adusted such that they are monotoneous
Facts
- dry weight: ln (W in mug) = 3.281 + 1.420 * ln (L in mm) (Ref: LemkBenk2003)
Bibliography