Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: Cfb, Dfb migrate: Mp phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THp food: biCi, jiHl, jiD class:
MRE = 0.049 habitat: 0iFp, 0iFm gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.004 embryo: Fh reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 6935 6936 (0.0001135) d life span fishbase
Lp 8.1 7.761 (0.0419) cm fork length at puberty fishbase
Li 61.7 64.56 (0.04638) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.0018 0.001809 (0.004973) g wet weight at birth KennFitz1974
Wwp 6.2 6.296 (0.01549) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 3700 3625 (0.02028) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 630.1 630.2 (6.588e-05) #/d gonado somatic index fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.07297) PatiNadj2010
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.07623) PatiNadj2010

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Scardinius erythrophthalmus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02001 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 19.23 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.5441 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.8018 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7999 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • temperatures are guessed
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.00851*(TL in cm)^3.15 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation