Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA, MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.7 ecozone: MIN, MPSW food: bjPz, jiCi, jiCvf class:
MRE = 0.024 habitat: 0jMp, jiMcp gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.001 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 9490 9827 (0.03553) d life span fishbase
Lp 64.8 63.63 (0.01811) cm fork length at puberty for female fishbase
Li 184 184.6 (0.003277) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 6.5e-05 6.064e-05 (0.06712) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 1970 1917 (0.02699) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 4.5e+04 4.681e+04 (0.04032) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 3.342e+04 3.17e+04 (0.05153) #/d max reprod rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.018) CollSchm1989
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.0153) CollSchm1989

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Scomberomorus cavalla Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02049 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 18.23 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.5723 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9914 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8023 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Bibliography

Citation