Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA, MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.7 ecozone: MIN, MPSW food: bjPz, jiCi, jiCvf class:
MRE = 0.082 habitat: 0jMp, jiMcp gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.017 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
tp 135 135.6 (0.004462) d age at puberty fishbase, McIlClae2005
am 7665 7644 (0.002785) d life span McIlClae2005
Lp 44 44.36 (0.008164) cm fork length at puberty for female NoegBoer2018
Li 240 241.2 (0.005097) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 6.5e-05 6.565e-05 (0.00995) g wet weight at birth NoegBoer2018
Wwp 431 432.8 (0.004225) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 7e+04 6.96e+04 (0.005703) g ultimate wet weight Wiki

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.1273) McIlClae2005
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.1122) McIlClae2005
LN fork length fecundity (0.2457) NoegBoer2018

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Scomberomorus commerson Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01919 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 17.28 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.6061 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9862 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7991 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Bibliography

Citation